Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(16): 2158-2166, 2020 11 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1153176

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In December 2019, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) broke out in Wuhan. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 have been reported, but the relationships between laboratory features and viral load has not been comprehensively described. METHODS: Adult inpatients (≥18 years old) with COVID-19 who underwent multiple (≥5 times) nucleic acid tests with nasal and pharyngeal swabs were recruited from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, including general patients (n = 70), severe patients (n = 195), and critical patients (n = 43). Laboratory data, demographic data, and clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records. The fitted polynomial curve was used to explore the association between serial viral loads and illness severity. RESULTS: Viral load of SARS-CoV-2 peaked within the first few days (2-4 days) after admission, then decreased rapidly along with virus rebound under treatment. Critical patients had the highest viral loads, in contrast to the general patients showing the lowest viral loads. The viral loads were higher in sputum compared with nasal and pharyngeal swab (P = .026). The positive rate of respiratory tract samples was significantly higher than that of gastrointestinal tract samples (P < .001). The SARS-CoV-2 viral load was negatively correlated with portion parameters of blood routine and lymphocyte subsets and was positively associated with laboratory features of cardiovascular system. CONCLUSIONS: The serial viral loads of patients revealed whole viral shedding during hospitalization and the resurgence of virus during the treatment, which could be used for early warning of illness severity, thus improve antiviral interventions.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Coronavirus/patogenicidad , China/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas Serológicas , Carga Viral
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(30): e21404, 2020 Jul 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-684117

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) has spread to >200 countries and regions. There is no effective antiviral drug for COVID-19. Traditional Chinese medicine, such as Lianhua Qingwen, has achieved some curative effect in many countries, but its effect is not clear. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of Lianhua Qingwen combined with Conventional antiviral Western Medicine in Clinical treatment of COVID-19 or asymptomatic infection. METHODS: The following electronic bibliographic databases will be searched to identify relevant studies: CNKI, CBM, VIP and Wanfang databases, PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane central, and clinical trial registration centers, such as China Clinical Trial Registration Center (ChiCTR), Netherlands National Trial Registration Center (NTR) and clinical trials.gov. In addition, Manual retrieval of articles, conference papers, ongoing experiments, internal reports, among others, to supplement electronic retrieval. Select all eligible studies published before May 8, 2020.According to the Cochrane Handbook "bias risk" assessment tool, bias risk is independently assessed. The independent Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to conduct methodological quality assessment of nonrandomized trials. STATA15.1 and RevMan5.3 software were used to analyze meta outcomes of different intervention measures for the treatment of new crown pneumonia and the control group (conventional antiviral western medicine treatment) clinical efficacy. RESULTS: This study will provide a relatively high-quality synthesis of current evidence of Lianhua Qingwen combined with Conventional antiviral Western Medicine in the treatment of COVID-19 from several aspects including the Clinical effective rate, CT improvement rate, severe conversion rate, antipyretic time, disappearance rate of fever symptoms, disappearance rate of cough symptoms, disappearance rate of asthenia symptoms, and adverse drug events. CONCLUSION: The conclusion of this review will provide evidence to judge whether Lianhua Qingwen combined with Conventional antiviral Western Medicine is an effective and safe intervention for COVID-19. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systemic review will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lianhua Qingwen combined with Conventional antiviral Western Medicine in the treatment of COVID-19. Since all the data included are published, the systematic review does not need ethical approval. INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202060067.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/administración & dosificación , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/virología , Proyectos de Investigación , SARS-CoV-2 , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA